Starting off with some background, if I may. American
Psycho, the novel, is about a man named Patrick Bateman. He is of the elite,
working on Wall Street by day, and brutally killing innocent people by night.
He kills out of pure hatred for the world he lives in and he kills anyone who
lives a life he doesn’t agree with. Horrible. I know.
Now
that the background is covered I can talk about my feelings right? Comparing
book to movie, which did I like better? The film. Not surprising for me, I am
usually partial to film. The movie was over all much more comical than the book
was. Not to make light of what Bateman was doing, or to render it as
acceptable. But to make the horrible deeds done in the book slightly more
tolerable in the on-screen adaptation. I can understand that some fans of the
book would argue they left important aspects out of the movie that were in the
book. But on the contrary, when you pay close attention in the movie the screenwriters
did a really good job incorporating some of the more violent scenes in a less heated
manner in the film.
An
example is one of the more controversial scenes in the novel where Bateman
kills “some old fa*ot with a dog”. Book fans say it was overlooked in the movie
and should have been included but when you pay attention, in the film when Jean
finds Bateman’s notebook, the doodles in the book are doodles of the murders
that actually happened in the book. As I said, a way to incorporate the well-known
violent scenes in a less harsh manner.
The book
is really, really, really graphic. And at some points I think it’s a little
much to say the least. I think the movie did a fine job pulling the overarching
theme and making it presentable to the public which is all you can ask for when
giving such vulgarity to start with.
No comments:
Post a Comment